Panasonic is renowned for its triumph 3MOS camcorders, like the simplest Buy-winning HC-X920, that uses 3 separate sensors to capture fantastic-looking footage, however Panasonic has continually provided glorious entry level camcorders too, the most recent of that is that the Panasonic HC-V520 - Associate in Nursing evolution of last year's Panasonic HC-V500.
It's a compact camera with one 1/5.8in BSI MOS device, a 50x optical zoom, Panasonic’s glorious Hybrid Optical Image Stabilisation system and a constitutional 802.11n Wi-Fi adapter that enables you to stream video to your TV or laptop among different things. The HC-V520 is additionally capable of capturing Full HD footage at a good most bitrate of a pair of8Mbit/s within the AVCHD 2.0 format and recording audio in biaural Ray M. Dolby Digital Stereo.
Although the device size remains identical, the HC-V520’s 50x optical zoom is longer than the HC-V500’s 38x optical zoom. The constitutional Wi-Fi adapter is actually new. Otherwise, the HC-V520 appearance and feels almost like the HC-V500.
Physically, it seems like Associate in Nursing entry level camera, with its plasticky, slightly low-cost feel, however in some places it really feels higher designed than the costlier HC-V720. On our review models a minimum of, the HC-V520’s zoom lever felt sturdier than the HC-V720’s lever. Even the Mode activate the rear of the camera felt harder. Even so, the HC-V520’s port cowls and American state card cover feel to a small degree too low-cost for a £425 camera.
As for connections, the HC-V520 provides the clean requirements and zip a lot of. It simply contains a mini USB for transferring your footage and pictures to your laptop, and mini HDMI and Av outputs for connecting it to your TV or projector. If you wish a electro-acoustic transducer input, a earpiece output and an adjunct shoe, you must think about the Panasonic HC-V720 instead.
IMAGE QUALITY
In daylight, the HC-V520’s image quality didn’t appear to own improved a lot of on it of the HC-V500. Compression artefacts were evident, with bound surfaces and textures having each a fogginess and blockiness concerning them. In our daylight top footage, as an example, the noise is extremely noticeable on the sides of the railings and numerous different objects, like the development materials on the vacant lot opposite our workplace (often mentioned as Gibb's result or dipteron noise). vividness and luminousness noise was additionally gift. The HC-V520 actually performed higher in out of doors and brilliantly lit indoor locations than dark environments, comparative to our expectations that's, as proven by the prevalence of luminousness noise in our low-light check.
Compression effects were additionally noticeable on numerous textures, like the fur of a number of our toys. a part of our toy chicken’s fur is hit by a light-weight supply that changes in intensity, and this appeared flat, slightly three-dimensional and while not texture. The fur seems fairly well rendered in different components of the toy, though it lacks the detail seen within the HC-X920’s footage. though we’ve highlighted numerous compression effects and noise, the HC-V520’s captured footage still appearance sensible for a sub-£500 camera. colors ar well reproduced and it captures an honest quantity of detail. For overall video quality, there wasn’t that a lot of distinction between the HC-V520 and therefore the HC-V720 despite the latter unit’s larger device.
.gif)
